For whoever understands a little more math, here is a site with the explained functioning of the device: http://cheniere.nii.net/references/found%20phys%20letters/no%201%202001/index.html.
For whoever does not know that much mathematics and still wants to know a little about Tom’s invention, here it is:
An electromagnetic generator without moving parts includes a permanent magnet and a magnetic core including first and second magnetic paths. A first input coil and a first output coil extend around portions of the first magnetic path, while a second input coil and a second output coil extend around portions of the second magnetic path. The input coils are alternatively pulsed to provide induced current pulses in the output coils. Driving electrical current through each of the input coils reduces a level of flux from the permanent magnet within the magnet path around which the input coil extends. In an alternative embodiment of an electromagnetic generator, the magnetic core includes annular spaced-apart plates, with posts and permanent magnets extending in an alternating fashion between the plates. An output coil extends around each of these posts. Input coils extending around portions of the plates are pulsed to cause the induction of current within the output coils.
The principle schematic of the device is this (click to enlarge):
“..This one works beautifully and produces COP=5.0…” says Tom Bearden
Also, here it’s the 3D model of it:
Of course, if you are interested in testing it, here’s one folk who did it: http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megv21.htm
First of all, MEG is an acronym for 'Motionless Electromagnetic Generator', not 'Motionless Energy Generator'. The idea of generating energy is nonsensical, because energy cannot be created.
ReplyDeleteSecondly~ the MEG is not advertised to work by somehow extracting energy from permanent magnets, as you claim. Bearden's site is very clear on this. It's function, is to use ultra-fast switching between multiple resonating inductance/capacitance circuits (think radio receivers). The idea for the MEG came from the testimony of Nikola Tesla, when he worked for Edison. Tesla noticed, that when the breakers were switched on in one of the grids, a glow would encapsulate the wires well before power transferred to a distant load. Bearden took this to mean that energy entered the system from somewhere else. Bearden's concept, is that a potential difference in an electric circuit pulls in energy from the zero-point field, but prolonged connection between opposite potentials( a closed DC circuit) negates such energy because the potentials net to zero. The MEG is a device with the aim of using fast switching to pump alleged zero point energy into a resonating inductance/capacitance circuit~ which hypothetically would serve as a storage circuit~ superficially analogous to a fly-wheel. If the open/closed circuit switching is just right, relative to the resonance of the inductance/capacitance circuit, the machine could work as a Zero point energy pump. Unfortunately, the machine failed. Naudin tested it, and obtained results that indicated that the MEG put out more than was put in, but he used an incorrect resistor value in his calculations. Doing the calculations with the correct resistor value shows that the MEG is nothing more than the most complex wire ever conceived.
You are correct. You have the correct name as he listed it on his patent application on 3/26/02. I have been pursuing "anti-gravity" and "limitless free energy" since as a kid "boy scientist" having NO knowledge of what I was doing inadvertently reproduced some of the experiments of Tesla. The government hired me out of college learning of some of my discoveries my "nothing is off-limits" thinking had produced vs. their own "stay in the government box" research their own billion dollar budgets science had not solved. I was "graduated" a year early and put to work with an unlimited budget and just told to "do whatever you want". I did so until realizing I was producing technology that the possible intent was to use it for OFFENSIVE purposes. I managed to quit the "AEC"? without major difficulty although they still "check up on me" every few years - four decades later! I have continued my investigations and research into both field and related fields. THIS patent is one of the few where I haven't chased it only to run into a brick wall where a patent is PERMANENTLY classified by the military or PERMANENTLY "still under review (for i.e. 20+ years+). Patent applicants have died or gone missing (all may be perfectly explainable) but there is much that eludes me. I have much to share with SERIOUS "travelers" in my "journey" and would welcome learning information I do not have. I am presently attempting to locate one Nick Cook ex-Jane's editor who I believe has much information of use in these searches. Anyway, for anyone who would like to chat with me my e-mail is gyantis at gmail Best regards, Gary W0TM (ham radio call letters often known as W0TM more than my own name!). a.ka. gyantis at midtec com
Deletemaybe u aren't aware that our earth itself is the perfect example of tesla's vision of free energy from coupling like magnetic fields to force the remaining pole to discharge the electrons freely passing from the vacuum ..Tesla was correct dynamic the way. the government knew it. thats why they confiscated his work. the key to making this concept work that has been overlooked in all the attempts to reproduce what Tesla did, I believe , is that there must be three magnets with two adjacent magnets spinning in opposite directions around the third which is stationary across the polar axis . all magnets being of the same type. all within a vacuum . betcha it'll work . . .
ReplyDeleteI am
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete